Recently there has been much discussion in the opinion section about being pro-choice. Dan Kelley and Wes Breckenridge are both “pro-choice.” If candidates are truly “pro-choice” can the voters expect a continuity in their rationale in order to help shrink government? Why not allow more choices and less government.
Drug use, prostitution, etc. are restricted by law because of inherent dangers to the innocent. Why not open up the pro-choice options in these areas? As a father to a 10-month-old boy, to think that 15 months ago my wife would have the “choice” to destroy him sickens me. So if you are truly “pro-choice” vote for citizens to actually have a choice not only in abortions.
Ben Miller
Newton