City Budget: Where were the complainers before the vote?

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

The more difficult the decision made by a governmental body, the easier it is to complain about it rather than offer alternatives.

Take, for instance, the Newton City Council’s decision this week to approve the proposed 2013-14 city budget, which calls for a 15-cent increase in the millage rate. Raising taxes at a time when there is a lot economic uncertainty isn’t always prudent, nor is it very popular.

But the issues leading up to the vote and the final vote itself were all discussed openly, and a public hearing was held to discuss the budget proposal. No one sent any written comments to City Hall; no one came to the public hearing to express concerns.

For his part, councilor Dennis Julius expressed a desire to soften the impact of the increase, but the rest of the council did not support his proposal. And for the council as a whole’s part, the citizens have previously expressed a desire for significant improvements in city services.

Those services cost money, and that money comes from only one source: us.

But two Daily News polls taken in the weeks leading up to approval of the city budget suggested there was a modest number of citizens opposed to tax increases, and at least a few who were not happy with many of the cost-saving changes the city has implemented.

So why didn’t anyone — even one person — speak out about the budget before it was passed?

That certainly didn’t keep a number of folks from immediately taking to the Internet and social media, deriding the council’s decision. Of course, most of those folks were commenting anonymously, cloaked in the veil of fictitious screen names.

But what of those who lashed out publicly?

Where were any of them when the council was in the process of developing its budget, a process that took months to complete? Where were any of them when the comprehensive plan — arguably a key contributor to the tax hike — was being developed?

Perhaps it’s because the adhered to Abraham Lincoln’s admonishment, “better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt,” but there are other well-thought opinions on exhibiting courage and speaking out. Elizabeth Cady Stanton perhaps said it best:

Previous Page|1||

Comments

Total Comments
3

View/Add Comments

Most Recent Comment

2tired wrote on March 12, 2013 9:17 p.m. ...
Let's eliminate city administrator next!


Newton Daily Deals Email:

National video

Reader Poll

Should state and local government spend tax money in an effort to draw a Sprint Cup race to the Iowa Speedway?

No, it is a private business and should operate on its own revenues
Yes, an investment in Iowa Speedway is an investment in our community's future
Only state money should be used, because the whole state benefits from Iowa Speedway
Only local money should be used, since Newton and Jasper County have the most to gain
Unsure