40 Years of Roe v. Wade

Landmark decision fueled decades of legal debate

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

In January of 1973, the issue of abortion was one of the most-debated topics in both American politics and American society. The landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Roe v. Wade, issued 40 years ago today, has done little to change that.

But, the story of “Roe v. Wade” dates back several months earlier, to June of 1969, when Norma L. McCorvey, a Texas divorcee, discovered she was pregnant with her third child. Coming from a troubled childhood, she had given up her first two children for adoption.

In Texas at the time, abortions were illegal in almost all cases. But, believing rape to be an exclusion to the law, McCorvey claimed to have been raped in an effort to obtain a legal abortion.

When this effort failed — there was no police report to document the alleged rape — she sought an illegal abortion. The illegal clinic had recently been shut down by police, though.

Meanwhile, Dallas attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington had been seeking an opportunity to challenge the Texas anti-abortion law. They took up McCorvey’s case in U.S. District Court using the alias “Jane Doe.” The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade.

Before the case could be heard, however, McCorvey gave birth to a daughter, who was adopted like her older siblings in a private adoption. The case itself reached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970, but the justices delayed hearing it and a companion case, Doe v. Bolton out of Georgia, until it had decided two other cases they felt would apply to the cases.

Oral arguments were to be heard Dec. 13, 1971, but before that could happen, justices Hugo Black and John Marshall Harlan retired from the court. Ultimately, it was decided to hear the case with only seven justices, as scheduled.

After the first round of arguments, the justices polled each other and found unanimous agreement to strike down the Texas anti-abortion law. Chief Justice Warren Burger assigned the writing of the Court’s opinion to Justice Harry Blackmun, who began drafting his preliminary opinion.

Previous Page|1||

Comments



Newton Daily Deals Email:

National video

Reader Poll

Should state and local government spend tax money in an effort to draw a Sprint Cup race to the Iowa Speedway?

No, it is a private business and should operate on its own revenues
Yes, an investment in Iowa Speedway is an investment in our community's future
Only state money should be used, because the whole state benefits from Iowa Speedway
Only local money should be used, since Newton and Jasper County have the most to gain
Unsure