Appellate court upholds lower court ruling in Maytag retiree benefit fight with Whirlpool Corp

The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a district court ruling Tuesday stating  Whirlpool Corp. had the right to alter Maytag retiree benefits after their union contract expired in 2008.

The appeal was brought to the higher court by the United Auto Workers Local 997 on Aug. 24, 2011, on behalf of nearly 3,000 Newton retirees, and the court heard oral arguments in the case April 18.

Ultimately, the St. Louis-based court agreed with the lower court’s decision stating that the union failed to prove that a “case or controversy” did not exist at the time Whirlpool filed legal action on July 24, 2008, one week before giving the retirees notice of the unilateral modifications to the retirement benefits.

Story Archived

Only the most recent 7 days of articles are available for free. For articles older than 7 days there is a small fee for retrieval from our archive. If you are a registered member of the site, the content is free just by signing in below.

Please sign in with your Comment Member ID and password.

Did you purchase access?

Member ID:
Password:
Forgot Your Password?
Register to comment.

Purchase Access
To allow for flexibility, we offer a variety of options for purchasing articles:
Purchase options


Having trouble?

If you have any technical difficulties, either with your username and password or with the payment options, please contact us by e-mail at archivedesk@shawmedia.com



Newton Daily Deals Email:

National video

Reader Poll

Should state and local government spend tax money in an effort to draw a Sprint Cup race to the Iowa Speedway?

No, it is a private business and should operate on its own revenues
Yes, an investment in Iowa Speedway is an investment in our community's future
Only state money should be used, because the whole state benefits from Iowa Speedway
Only local money should be used, since Newton and Jasper County have the most to gain
Unsure