Commercial property tax plan not beneficial

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

Gov. Branstad and Republicans in the Iowa House have reached consensus this week on a plan to slash commercial property taxes by 40 percent phased in over a period of eight years — the goal being to improve the atmosphere for businesses across Iowa.

Improving the business climate in Iowa is a good idea in theory, however, this proposed property tax cut has the potential to seriously cripple local government without actually providing a truly significant benefit businesses. It has the added potential to shift a higher proportion of the taxes onto the backs of Iowa homeowners, and that’s the wrong approach. We shouldn’t seek to improve our business climate at the expense of the average Iowan.

There’s still a long way to go before this plan reaches reality, and a lot can change. But in its current form, the plan appears to have a negligible impact on Iowa’s business climate while cutting hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue from Iowa municipalities across the state.

In Newton, it appears the tax cut could equal a loss of about $750,000 in revenue per year by the time the full 40 percent cut takes effect. If commercial property values increase between now and then, that number could be offset somewhat but likely would still represent a significant revenue shortfall. The proposed plan includes $240 million in state aid given to local governments to help them adjust to the loss of revenue, but at the end of the day, once the tax break is completely phased in and aid runs out, local governments will have to account for the lost revenue somehow.

That’s where things get tricky.

No one likes paying taxes, but it’s important to remember that taxes go to fund the services we receive from the government. This is especially true of property taxes, which directly fund our local government entities, city, county and schools. The more we pay in taxes, the better our services should be. The less we pay in taxes, the worse our services will be. Simple as that.

If our local government entities have revenue slashed, they will need to either increase taxes elsewhere or cut services — probably both.

Previous Page|1||

Comments

Total Comments
0

View/Add Comments

There have been no comments made about this story.


Newton Daily Deals Email:

National video

Reader Poll

Do you believe the "Buffet Rule" would help reduce the deficit?

Yes
No
No - The money would be spent on program funding