Contraceptive mandate tests religious freedom

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

An Obama administration mandate requiring all employers to offer health plans with no-cost birth control for women raises several red flags — and not just for Catholics. It’s a move that impinges on the conscience of some Americans. And that’s not a road the federal government should travel down.

President Barack Obama sent shockwaves throughout the Catholic Church this month when he refused to grant religious institutions an exemption to the mandate. The only fig leaf he offered was a one-year extension to implement the policy, which clearly seems an election-year maneuver. Obama courted Catholics in 2008, and he’ll need them again in November. But this mandate has alienated many of those voters.

Last summer, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced several women’s preventive services, including contraception, well-woman visits, breastfeeding support and domestic violence screening, would be required in new health plans starting this August. The mandate provides a narrow exemption for churches but not for religious-affiliated charities, schools or hospitals. Even an in-person meeting between Archbishop Timothy Dolan, head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and Obama failed to persuade the president to broaden the exemption.

Obama’s refusal to do so is contrary to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which upheld the independence of religious organizations from government interference in their relations with employees. The case originated from a Redford Lutheran church and school.

Catholics traditionally oppose any contraception. While many other Christian denominations don’t contest birth control, they do oppose abortion. Some say the new rules include emergency contraceptives that induce chemical abortions soon after conception.

Tom Messner, a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation with a special interest in religious liberty, says the mandate is one of the “broadest attacks in American history” against religious groups. Even the Department of Health and Human Services acknowledges many insurance plans already include full birth control coverage, so the mandate is clearly targeted at the few institutions that have chosen not to purchase these plans.

As Messner notes, “Why go the last mile and force every plan to include them, when doing so will cause such a broad and heavy burden on religious freedom?”

Previous Page|1||

Comments

Total Comments
0

View/Add Comments

There have been no comments made about this story.


Newton Daily Deals Email:

National video

Reader Poll

Do you believe the "Buffet Rule" would help reduce the deficit?

Yes
No
No - The money would be spent on program funding