Budget stalemate, flood relief issues

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

The budget stalemate continues.

Unfortunately, legislative leadership and the governor’s office have yet to find common ground on the pressing issues preventing closure of the session. While Senate majority leadership fights for preschool funding and 2 percent allowable growth for schools, the governor demands bi-annual budgeting.

I support efforts to strengthen our schools, and I oppose bi-annual budgeting. A two-year budget would expand the powers of the executive office. This precedent would allow Branstad and future governors to choose the winners and losers of mid-budget adjustments.

In the closing days, it’s important to keep our focus on strengthening Iowa’s middle class. With nearly $1 billion in surplus and savings, we must balance the budget while providing tax relief to middle-class families and small businesses. There’s no need to back up on our commitments to good-paying jobs, quality schools and affordable higher education.

We must continue efforts to reform Iowa’s property tax system. While there is agreement that commercial property taxes are too high, crafting a solution that won’t raise taxes on homeowners and farmers continues to be the biggest obstacle. Currently, there are two plans on the table.

I support a plan that would provide up to $200 million in property tax relief targeted to Main Street — locally-owned businesses. These small businesses make up 83 percent of commercial property taxpayers. Easing their burden would eventually put them in a position to hire more help.

An alternate proposal, supported by the House majority and the governor’s office, would cut commercial property taxes by 25 percent over the next five years. However, the plan does not require the state to make up the difference. This means homeowners, who already shoulder 49 percent of the property tax burden, would foot the bill. This is a bad move for Iowa. I want to see families move into the middle-class not be forced out.

In talking with local officials, I’ve learned the plan would also have a devastating impact on schools, essential services and local job efforts.

In addition to preparing for the Governor’s Education Summit, I’ve taken advantage of the extra days under the golden dome to further study and follow up on several issues. This week, I focused on flood recovery and prevention efforts.

Previous Page|1|||

Comments



Newton Daily Deals Email:

National video

Reader Poll

Should state and local government spend tax money in an effort to draw a Sprint Cup race to the Iowa Speedway?

No, it is a private business and should operate on its own revenues
Yes, an investment in Iowa Speedway is an investment in our community's future
Only state money should be used, because the whole state benefits from Iowa Speedway
Only local money should be used, since Newton and Jasper County have the most to gain
Unsure